The graphical convergence monitor for the 40-fluid run
 shown here
gives proof of a satisfactorily converging calculation;
 and computer 
times are seen to be small. 
 
The results
 The table shows how the number of fluids influences the predicted
    rate of smoke production and the computer time. 
     
| number | smoke | seconds | 
|  1 |    0.74 | 100 | 
| 10 |    2.38 |  139 | 
| 20 |    2.28 | 217 | 
| 30 |    2.31 | 267 | 
| 40 |    2.26 | 485 | 
| 50 |    2.27 | 599 | 
 Note that:
- On this occasion MFM  predicts more smoke production than 
    the conventional single-fluid model; and
 - the 10-fluid model provides a good approximation.
 
 The following figures show the computed PDFs for a location in the 
middle of the outlet plane of the combustor, for 
10 fluids, 
40 fluids, 
50 fluids. 
 The shapes are all similar; and the root-mean-square and 
population-average values do not differ much.
The following contour plots show various aspects of the 50-fluid 
calculation:
- The very different smoke distributions on an axial plane 
    according to:
 (a) the single-fluid 
(no fluctuations) model and
 (b) the multi-fluid model 
The flow is from right to left. 
 - The somewhat different distributions of population-average temperature
according to:
(a) the single-fluid model 
and
 
(b) the multi-fluid model 
The highest temperature encountered is (understandably) greater for the 
single-fluid than for the multi-fluid model.
 - The concentrations of fluids:
fluid 1, (pure air) 
 
  fluid 6, (fuel-lean) ,
  and 
fluid 11 (approximately stoichiometric).